PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
107.94%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 758.06%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.93%
D&A growth well above INTC's 2.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-21.62%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-0.81%
Negative yoy SBC while INTC is 3.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
132.99%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -106.96%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
163.66%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -465.36%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-25.40%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -34.56%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
78.95%
Lower AP growth vs. INTC's 1305.00%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-46.19%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -193.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
188.24%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -346.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
473.72%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -20.60%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
3.96%
Some CapEx rise while INTC is negative at -16.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.31%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. INTC's 35.07%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-55.17%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -19.90%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-327.78%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 2325.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-100.13%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 28.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.19%
Buyback growth of 65.19% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.