PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
44.48%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -114.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-9.86%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 1.51%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-75.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-0.54%
Negative yoy SBC while INTC is 48.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
213.89%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -3984.21%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-123.31%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 114.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
180.17%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -207.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
105.70%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -237.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
446.23%
Some yoy usage while INTC is negative at -187.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-166.67%
Negative yoy while INTC is 130.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
29.44%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -126.45%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
51.28%
CapEx growth well above INTC's 10.84%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-207.79%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-31.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 14.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-4.78%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 22.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-187.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -81.51%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-20925.00%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 51.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-1086.36%
We cut debt repayment yoy while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.20%
Buyback growth of 58.20% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.