PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.80%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -0.22%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
71.35%
D&A growth well above MRVL's 0.58%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-399.83%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.34%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -79.34%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.59%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MRVL at -107.11%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
172.03%
Growth well above MRVL's 129.18%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
2.58%
Growth of 2.58% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
62.89%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -19.13%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
24.93%
Lower CapEx growth vs. MRVL's 63.62%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
99.22%
Acquisition spending well above MRVL's 99.17%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while MRVL is negative at -187.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
75.40%
Investing outflow well above MRVL's 88.80%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.27%
Negative yoy issuance while MRVL is 729.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-216.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while MRVL is 97.25%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.