PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-61.23%
Negative net income growth while MRVL stands at 117.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.33%
Some D&A expansion while MRVL is negative at -47.57%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-100.52%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.09%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MRVL is 182.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
67.16%
AR growth of 67.16% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-134.57%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MRVL at -178.69%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
289.53%
AP growth of 289.53% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-112.19%
Negative yoy usage while MRVL is 180.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
348.40%
Well above MRVL's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-67.48%
Negative yoy CFO while MRVL is 131.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-157.46%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -19.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-14.69%
Negative yoy purchasing while MRVL stands at 90.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
23.49%
We have some liquidation growth while MRVL is negative at -87.20%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
100.00%
Growth well above MRVL's 69.96%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-15.66%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 59.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
700.61%
We slightly raise equity while MRVL is negative at -58.40%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.