PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.81%
Negative net income growth while MRVL stands at 20.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.02%
Negative yoy D&A while MRVL is 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.64%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -11250.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
136.74%
Some inventory rise while MRVL is negative at -3615.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.89%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -750.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
265.77%
Growth of 265.77% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
77.62%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -26.06%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
53.86%
Some CapEx rise while MRVL is negative at -25.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.79%
Some yoy expansion while MRVL is negative at -54.40%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
102.09%
Liquidation growth of 102.09% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.45%
Investing outflow well above MRVL's 270.61%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.07%
Buyback growth of 20.07% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.