PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.84%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -87.18%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.40%
Less D&A growth vs. MRVL's 6.81%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-15683.13%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
12.65%
SBC growth of 12.65% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
195.41%
Well above MRVL's 11.15% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
119.02%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MRVL's 295.75%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
215.87%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -7.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-51.83%
Both negative yoy, with MRVL at -3.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
1601.67%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -21.91%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-43.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -4.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.97%
Some yoy expansion while MRVL is negative at -49.41%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-26.92%
We reduce yoy sales while MRVL is 1896.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
124.16%
Investing outflow well above MRVL's 198.37%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.