PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.20%
Negative net income growth while MRVL stands at 5309.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
11.97%
Some D&A expansion while MRVL is negative at -9.82%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
40.24%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MRVL's 99.61%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MRVL at -148.09%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.96%
Negative yoy inventory while MRVL is 228.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.12%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -97.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
83.40%
Some yoy increase while MRVL is negative at -109.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-42.47%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MRVL at -20.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-187.43%
Negative yoy CapEx while MRVL is 15.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.45%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MRVL's 89.56%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
135.13%
We have some liquidation growth while MRVL is negative at -78.45%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
98.01%
Growth well above MRVL's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
105.76%
Investing outflow well above MRVL's 52.58%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.14%
We slightly raise equity while MRVL is negative at -49.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
30.43%
Buyback growth of 30.43% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.