PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
96.98%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -1.55%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.13%
Some D&A expansion while MRVL is negative at -3.50%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
179.92%
Well above MRVL's 92.68% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-9.32%
Negative yoy SBC while MRVL is 22.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
78.55%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -31.69%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
55.09%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. MRVL's 362.97%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-1937.56%
Negative yoy inventory while MRVL is 3796.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-4.14%
Both negative yoy AP, with MRVL at -70.41%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
110.36%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -153.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
644.85%
Some yoy increase while MRVL is negative at -21.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
2281.65%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -4.77%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-114.17%
Negative yoy CapEx while MRVL is 27.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.77%
Purchases well above MRVL's 47.03%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-19.08%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MRVL at -42.28%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-237.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -115.50%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
74.72%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -26.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
3.69%
Debt repayment growth of 3.69% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.