176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-16.79%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MRVL at -27.12%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.19%
Less D&A growth vs. MRVL's 8.83%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-137.46%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
8.16%
Less SBC growth vs. MRVL's 20.12%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
255.98%
Less working capital growth vs. MRVL's 10217.21%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-4829.52%
AR is negative yoy while MRVL is 178.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
122.70%
Inventory growth well above MRVL's 240.11%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-130.94%
Negative yoy AP while MRVL is 105.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
401.23%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -337.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-351210.00%
Both negative yoy, with MRVL at -99.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
148.51%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MRVL's 49.80%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-6.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -84.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.78%
Negative yoy purchasing while MRVL stands at 38.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
61.73%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MRVL's 18.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.63%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MRVL's 190.69%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-3.13%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.