PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.08%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MRVL at -6.71%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.45%
Some D&A expansion while MRVL is negative at -10.55%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
185.58%
Well above MRVL's 99.37% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-1.89%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MRVL at -21.28%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-160.15%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MRVL is 190.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
33.41%
AR growth while MRVL is negative at -580.45%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
24.55%
Some inventory rise while MRVL is negative at -109.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-182.69%
Negative yoy AP while MRVL is 196.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-182.35%
Negative yoy usage while MRVL is 249.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-253.77%
Both negative yoy, with MRVL at -32.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-62.31%
Negative yoy CFO while MRVL is 133.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
56.21%
Some CapEx rise while MRVL is negative at -42.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -106.99%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
39.14%
Some yoy expansion while MRVL is negative at -24.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
15.19%
At 50-75% of MRVL's 21.92%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
934.48%
We have some outflow growth while MRVL is negative at -234.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
69.96%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -233.81%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-222.27%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1240.34%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -5111.59%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.