PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
35.16%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -16.97%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.23%
Negative yoy D&A while MRVL is 0.84%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
41.06%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MRVL's 93.75%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
7.86%
SBC growth while MRVL is negative at -2.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
47.36%
Less working capital growth vs. MRVL's 152.79%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-25.95%
AR is negative yoy while MRVL is 59.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-429.45%
Negative yoy inventory while MRVL is 186.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
250.66%
A yoy AP increase while MRVL is negative at -2865.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-6.48%
Negative yoy usage while MRVL is 101.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-69.35%
Negative yoy while MRVL is 20.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
123.95%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MRVL's 24.01%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-76.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -27.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.99%
Some yoy expansion while MRVL is negative at -191.48%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-27.12%
We reduce yoy sales while MRVL is 8.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.23%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -1486.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-3.22%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.