PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
122.53%
Net income growth above 1.5x MRVL's 41.54%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
2.13%
D&A growth well above MRVL's 0.54%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
75.61%
Deferred tax of 75.61% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
12.07%
SBC growth while MRVL is negative at -24.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-63.77%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MRVL is 84.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-57.02%
AR is negative yoy while MRVL is 80.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-23.62%
Negative yoy inventory while MRVL is 158.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-12.12%
Both negative yoy AP, with MRVL at -245.90%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-36.21%
Negative yoy usage while MRVL is 619.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
712.50%
Some yoy increase while MRVL is negative at -82.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
148.91%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 104.89%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-18.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while MRVL is 16.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.84%
Some yoy expansion while MRVL is negative at -16.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-22.62%
We reduce yoy sales while MRVL is 89.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-83.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while MRVL is 231.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-21.56%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 90.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-44400.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-222.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -50374.11%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.