PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.16%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -210.29%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.08%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MRVL at -4.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-29.17%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 1009560.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.23%
SBC growth while MRVL is negative at -14.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
66.08%
Less working capital growth vs. MRVL's 1117.46%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
103.68%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. MRVL's 298.42%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
27.39%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MRVL's 395.44%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-139.08%
Both negative yoy AP, with MRVL at -29.77%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
132.91%
Growth well above MRVL's 199.82%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-73.47%
Both negative yoy, with MRVL at -903.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
57.42%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -2.15%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-34.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while MRVL is 37.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.12%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -2.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
3.68%
Below 50% of MRVL's 24.38%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-300.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MRVL is 869.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-14.07%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 647.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
49.21%
Debt repayment growth of 49.21% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-624.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -121.18%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.