PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.19%
Net income growth under 50% of MRVL's 55.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.26%
Some D&A expansion while MRVL is negative at -1.39%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
322.73%
Well above MRVL's 118.08% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
7.89%
SBC growth while MRVL is negative at -6.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
71.87%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -2891.35%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-58.00%
AR is negative yoy while MRVL is 33.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-25.93%
Negative yoy inventory while MRVL is 72.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
152.63%
A yoy AP increase while MRVL is negative at -187.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
212.35%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -648.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-66.67%
Both negative yoy, with MRVL at -371.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
150.00%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -25.08%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MRVL stands at 93.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
73.17%
Purchases well above MRVL's 7.54%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-61.48%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MRVL at -15.12%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
6420.00%
We have some outflow growth while MRVL is negative at -205.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-65.25%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 30.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
77.52%
Debt repayment growth of 77.52% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-298.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -33.06%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.