PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
43.32%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -6.83%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.76%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
30.49%
SBC growth while MRVL is negative at -15.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
204.55%
Well above MRVL's 129.28% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
118.99%
AR growth well above MRVL's 138.37%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-2.94%
Negative yoy inventory while MRVL is 58.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
28.57%
Lower AP growth vs. MRVL's 158.71%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-83.52%
Negative yoy usage while MRVL is 99.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-14.29%
Negative yoy while MRVL is 101.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
64.11%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of MRVL's 113.52%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-27.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -206.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.09%
Some yoy expansion while MRVL is negative at -47.01%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
11.62%
Below 50% of MRVL's 88.98%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
12.34%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MRVL's 1322.48%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
9.16%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MRVL's 828.48%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
54.41%
Debt repayment growth of 54.41% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.08%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x MRVL's 36.72%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.