PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.72%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -895.49%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
15.25%
Less D&A growth vs. MRVL's 123.84%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-233.87%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 71.85%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
3.76%
SBC growth while MRVL is negative at -15.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-99.30%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MRVL is 207.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-26.02%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MRVL at -707.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-10.92%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MRVL at -219.61%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-65.33%
Negative yoy AP while MRVL is 250.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-114.65%
Negative yoy usage while MRVL is 218.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
7.14%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MRVL's 235.99%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-46.66%
Negative yoy CFO while MRVL is 383.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-16.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -3.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.38%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MRVL's 761.64%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
21.18%
We have some liquidation growth while MRVL is negative at -96.37%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
154.59%
We have some outflow growth while MRVL is negative at -4497.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
127.20%
Investing outflow well above MRVL's 99.92%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-203.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -102.85%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.