PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-53.98%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MRVL at -384.87%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
14.71%
Some D&A expansion while MRVL is negative at -1.39%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-315.66%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 2437.04%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
13.77%
SBC growth well above MRVL's 0.68%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
152.99%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -145.36%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
242.55%
AR growth while MRVL is negative at -259.40%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
52.00%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MRVL's 149.71%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-790.38%
Both negative yoy AP, with MRVL at -227.62%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
852.17%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -53.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
23.08%
Some yoy increase while MRVL is negative at -24.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
84.39%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -64.38%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-35.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -29.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.21%
Some yoy expansion while MRVL is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-61.79%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MRVL at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-34.15%
We reduce yoy other investing while MRVL is 582.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-81.74%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 1101.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
60.00%
Debt repayment growth of 60.00% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-262.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while MRVL is 7.34%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.