PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-30.39%
Negative net income growth while MRVL stands at 81.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
16.67%
D&A growth well above MRVL's 6.64%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
87.83%
Some yoy growth while MRVL is negative at -97.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
13.38%
SBC growth well above MRVL's 15.85%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-77.65%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MRVL is 160.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-77.08%
AR is negative yoy while MRVL is 157.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
198.08%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MRVL's 536.72%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
65.74%
AP growth well above MRVL's 93.49%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-164.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MRVL at -151.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
80.00%
Some yoy increase while MRVL is negative at -92.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-19.82%
Negative yoy CFO while MRVL is 55.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
36.95%
CapEx growth well above MRVL's 29.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.96%
Purchases growth of 39.96% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
75.53%
Liquidation growth of 75.53% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
567.90%
We have some outflow growth while MRVL is negative at -100.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
3637.50%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -233.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MRVL's 33.33%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.86%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x MRVL's 3.97%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.