PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
62.39%
Some net income increase while MRVL is negative at -43.90%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.67%
Some yoy growth while MRVL is negative at -418.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
702.00%
Well above MRVL's 11.58% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
132.92%
AR growth while MRVL is negative at -281.82%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-32.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MRVL at -447.48%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
74.36%
A yoy AP increase while MRVL is negative at -65.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-89.39%
Negative yoy usage while MRVL is 108.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
33.33%
Well above MRVL's 64.41%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
75.21%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -10.44%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
8.85%
CapEx growth well above MRVL's 8.21%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.52%
Purchases growth of 99.52% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-69.70%
We reduce yoy sales while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-62.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -2006.38%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-64.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -1984.03%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-304.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -18.28%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.