PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.79%
Net income growth under 50% of MRVL's 2248.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
15.22%
D&A growth well above MRVL's 19.02%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
4.55%
Some yoy growth while MRVL is negative at -7464.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-1.35%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MRVL at -20.36%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-58.60%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MRVL at -70.98%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-292.38%
AR is negative yoy while MRVL is 108.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-56.86%
Negative yoy inventory while MRVL is 210.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-23.53%
Both negative yoy AP, with MRVL at -450.95%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
2728.57%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -1487.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
3050.00%
Some yoy increase while MRVL is negative at -8100.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-10.67%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MRVL at -14.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-39.81%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -2.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while MRVL stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-99.85%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MRVL at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-100.15%
We reduce yoy other investing while MRVL is 68.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-112.02%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 325.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.44%
We have some buyback growth while MRVL is negative at -1460.87%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.