PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
114.79%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 85.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-25.99%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MRVL at -3.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
33.75%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MRVL's 313.53%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
2.41%
SBC growth while MRVL is negative at -4.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-368.75%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MRVL is 22.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-1152.27%
AR is negative yoy while MRVL is 54.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-272.22%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MRVL at -18033.33%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
2912.50%
A yoy AP increase while MRVL is negative at -84.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-315.06%
Negative yoy usage while MRVL is 163.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
122.22%
Some yoy increase while MRVL is negative at -92.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-18.38%
Negative yoy CFO while MRVL is 14.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-117.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -79.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
81.04%
Acquisition growth of 81.04% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
38.72%
Purchases growth of 38.72% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
239.22%
Liquidation growth of 239.22% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
97.15%
We have some outflow growth while MRVL is negative at -1500.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
85.17%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -82.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.