PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-59.46%
Negative net income growth while MRVL stands at 102.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
13.17%
D&A growth well above MRVL's 0.14%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
18.27%
Some yoy growth while MRVL is negative at -91.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
12.11%
SBC growth well above MRVL's 10.22%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
101.76%
Well above MRVL's 32.22% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
115.23%
AR growth well above MRVL's 28.17%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-29.46%
Negative yoy inventory while MRVL is 35.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
19.22%
A yoy AP increase while MRVL is negative at -193.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
159.25%
Growth well above MRVL's 137.33%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-99.86%
Negative yoy while MRVL is 6804.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-26.63%
Negative yoy CFO while MRVL is 70.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-19.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -95.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
63.89%
Some acquisitions while MRVL is negative at -24.09%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
7.39%
Purchases growth of 7.39% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-17.75%
We reduce yoy sales while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
14.29%
We have some outflow growth while MRVL is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-38.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -57.65%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while MRVL is negative at -237.61%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with MRVL at -233.33%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.