PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.33%
Net income growth at 75-90% of MU's 19.08%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
10.39%
D&A growth well above MU's 0.72%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
64.51%
Deferred tax of 64.51% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
8.59%
SBC growth well above MU's 1.61%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
149.76%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-101.53%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -139.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-21.67%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 192.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
105.22%
Lower AP growth vs. MU's 258.99%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
4124.14%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -175.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-975.44%
Negative yoy while MU is 137.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
21.67%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 16.92%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
16.79%
CapEx growth of 16.79% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
46.76%
Acquisition growth of 46.76% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
0.89%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MU's 11.85%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-58.34%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -15.92%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
302.72%
Growth well above MU's 18.42%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-36.49%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 17.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.63%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.