PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.80%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 88.57%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
71.35%
Some D&A expansion while MU is negative at -2.25%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-399.83%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 79.21%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.34%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -196.73%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.59%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 23.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
172.03%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -148.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
2.58%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -90.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
62.89%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -120.46%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
24.93%
CapEx growth well above MU's 23.11%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
99.22%
Some acquisitions while MU is negative at -20.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above MU's 85.41%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
75.40%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MU's 186.44%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -13.73%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-216.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.