PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.32%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 46.14%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-13.07%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 1.49%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
99.71%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -84.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-142.86%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-76.34%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -104.41%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
90.15%
AR growth while MU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
56.90%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -267.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-116.69%
Both negative yoy AP, with MU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
138.39%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MU's 501.55%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-77.09%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -45.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
2.58%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MU's 16.88%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
74.85%
CapEx growth well above MU's 39.23%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-106.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
27.20%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -104.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
226.86%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 5.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-8060.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -103.05%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
44.85%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -339.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.47%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 135.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.