PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-93.69%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -96.01%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
9.66%
D&A growth well above MU's 3.43%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
100.00%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -19.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
100.00%
SBC growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
58.56%
Less working capital growth vs. MU's 144.44%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
21.54%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 95.14%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-35.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -94.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-47.14%
Negative yoy while MU is 223.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-98.63%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -74.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-31.33%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 32.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-35.44%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -60.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -5.13%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
2886.21%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -94.59%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
20.16%
Investing outflow well above MU's 17.60%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -68.99%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.