PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-61.23%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 100.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.33%
D&A growth well above MU's 4.59%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-100.52%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 52.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.09%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 57.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
67.16%
AR growth well above MU's 63.75%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-134.57%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 31.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
289.53%
A yoy AP increase while MU is negative at -85.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-112.19%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -6.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
348.40%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -178.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-67.48%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 128.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-157.46%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -76.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 344.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-14.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -174.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
23.49%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -13.83%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
100.00%
Growth well above MU's 0.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-15.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -206.40%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
700.61%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. MU's 5287.06%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.