PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.66%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 65.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.57%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 1.42%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.69%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-25.75%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
115.01%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -776.90%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
79.44%
AR growth of 79.44% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-102.10%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -174.14%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
158.78%
AP growth of 158.78% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
97.33%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -181.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-100.18%
Negative yoy while MU is 111.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6579.03%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -29.82%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-50.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -5.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while MU is negative at -70.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-58.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -34.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-12.28%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 18.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -109.81%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-344.73%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -92.15%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.64%
We slightly raise equity while MU is negative at -18.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.