PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
85.51%
Net income growth at 50-75% of MU's 133.70%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
29.38%
Some D&A expansion while MU is negative at -1.19%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.86%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -127.90%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.22%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 174.59%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
482.80%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -142.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
4013.65%
Well above MU's 41.88%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
22750.46%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -8.75%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.89%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 42.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 11.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-11.00%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 12.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-482.88%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 73.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.83%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. MU's 26.14%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.