PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
34.23%
Net income growth at 75-90% of MU's 45.24%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
-19.92%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -3.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-102.35%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-78.68%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
107.34%
Less working capital growth vs. MU's 234.76%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
144.81%
AR growth of 144.81% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
143.18%
Inventory growth well above MU's 61.41%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-205.92%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-101.15%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 70.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-100.49%
Negative yoy while MU is 140.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-9.67%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 39.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.88%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -87.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.99%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -14.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
29.49%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 10.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.12%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -176.54%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.34%
We slightly raise equity while MU is negative at -1.80%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.