PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.26%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -27.86%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.99%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 1.06%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1314.75%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -114.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.58%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -770.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
315.78%
Growth well above MU's 72.52%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
2945.57%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -56.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
168.00%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -13.92%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-74.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -71.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-215.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -21.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
77.43%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 40.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-25.27%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 207.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-136.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -132.50%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.84%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 51.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-25.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.