PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.52%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 80.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.02%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 10.21%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-133.25%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 86.49%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2742.05%
SBC growth of 2742.05% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-203.72%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 17.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
9.47%
AR growth of 9.47% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-392.66%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -71.79%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
4015.99%
AP growth of 4015.99% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-176.67%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 821.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-29.49%
Negative yoy while MU is 21.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-77.64%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 29.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
11.85%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -91.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-452.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -57.73%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
40.63%
Purchases well above MU's 16.41%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-87.51%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 60.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-452.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -374.34%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1371.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -3.42%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
288.99%
Stock issuance far above MU's 128.98%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.