PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.80%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -145.22%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.74%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 10.53%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
99.93%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -400.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-99.93%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-75.77%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 50.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
65.49%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -19.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-203.16%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
177.25%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -460.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-66.26%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -33.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
2.69%
CapEx growth well above MU's 1.64%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while MU is negative at -68.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
27.78%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MU's 78.72%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
218.65%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -23.17%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -109.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
90.46%
Investing outflow well above MU's 44.40%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -78.05%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-149.96%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.