PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.84%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -332.69%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.40%
D&A growth well above MU's 5.71%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-15683.13%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 180.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
12.65%
SBC growth of 12.65% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
195.41%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -560.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
119.02%
Inventory growth well above MU's 13.33%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
215.87%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -177.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-51.83%
Negative yoy while MU is 155.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
1601.67%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -73.17%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-43.14%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 37.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.97%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -27.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-26.92%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -33.22%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
124.16%
Investing outflow well above MU's 25.53%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.