PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
53.51%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 29.78%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
37.00%
D&A growth well above MU's 6.76%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
716.37%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -325.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
495026.74%
SBC growth of 495026.74% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-132.48%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 21.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
266.15%
Inventory growth well above MU's 33.33%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.01%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 5.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
100.35%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -120.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-20.37%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 87.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-162.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -12.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-3043200.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 196.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-108.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -6.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
53.13%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -86.93%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10342.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -176.10%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.55%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. MU's 180.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.