PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.11%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -65.82%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-8.63%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 6.33%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-331.25%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-59.60%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
336.79%
Well above MU's 82.04% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
143.06%
AR growth of 143.06% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
8.02%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 125.96%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
188.76%
AP growth of 188.76% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
59.50%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MU's 121.57%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-19.83%
Negative yoy while MU is 2125.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
33.03%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MU's 91.67%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
50.29%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -1.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while MU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-542.02%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 48.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
167.39%
Below 50% of MU's 398.70%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
100.00%
Growth well above MU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
75.51%
Investing outflow well above MU's 53.76%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -85.71%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-25.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.