PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
30.60%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -196.56%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.78%
D&A growth well above MU's 1.39%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
100.00%
Deferred tax of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-45.34%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 321.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
143.65%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -177.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
107.43%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MU's 368.18%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
84.10%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MU's 475.31%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
8.03%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 2.17%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
20.07%
CapEx growth well above MU's 29.28%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.02%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MU's 77.24%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-25.56%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -90.89%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.43%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -27.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.13%
We slightly raise equity while MU is negative at -50.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
0.49%
Buyback growth of 0.49% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.