PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.43%
Net income growth at 50-75% of MU's 69.63%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
3.57%
D&A growth well above MU's 0.39%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.63%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -145.12%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-153.73%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 80.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6505.72%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -132.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-53.53%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -104.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
14.80%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -23.05%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-65.26%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 7.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -285.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-8.03%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 282.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-222.09%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 29.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.68%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-0.53%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.