PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-168.40%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -6.37%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
11.96%
Some D&A expansion while MU is negative at -9.09%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-182.21%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
213.49%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -185.96%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
80.39%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -638.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
708.31%
Growth well above MU's 470.59%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
570.31%
Well above MU's 143.71%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-44.26%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -5.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
73.53%
CapEx growth well above MU's 61.11%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-34.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -20500.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-51.50%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -94.31%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
314.53%
Growth well above MU's 209.54%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-811.88%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 73.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.73%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.