PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
151.06%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 61.38%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
6.47%
Some D&A expansion while MU is negative at -4.81%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
84.48%
Deferred tax of 84.48% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-172.56%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 68.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-667.43%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.58%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 49.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
209.78%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -103.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-46.88%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -55.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-103.70%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 39.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.50%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MU's 86.17%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
21.13%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-107.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -84.70%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
84.02%
Investing outflow well above MU's 51.16%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
180.86%
Issuance growth of 180.86% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.