PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-339.14%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 69.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.53%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -4.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-524.40%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
155.21%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -80.43%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.81%
Inventory growth well above MU's 67.86%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
403.71%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -140.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
10.77%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MU's 237.04%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-146.15%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 136.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
60.58%
CapEx growth well above MU's 23.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.75%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MU's 200.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-70.22%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-664.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -194.83%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-12.36%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 111.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.51%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.