PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
47.70%
Net income growth at 50-75% of MU's 87.62%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-2.64%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -1.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
17.72%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MU's 43.59%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-85.06%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -29.03%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
17.84%
Less working capital growth vs. MU's 82.23%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-438.22%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-78.54%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 27.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
579.12%
AP growth of 579.12% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
240.39%
Growth well above MU's 92.45%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
229.59%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -66.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-4.93%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 146.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
15.02%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -50.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.46%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-11.55%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1372.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -852.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
46.40%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MU's 19.29%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-81.26%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.