PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
202.16%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 153.30%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-1.12%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 2.26%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
117.85%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -1804.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-9.43%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -9.09%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-124.83%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -123.88%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
4.04%
AR growth of 4.04% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-97.43%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 132.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-18.55%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-130.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -583.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-74.93%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -416.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
4.59%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MU's 10.57%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
6.02%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -22.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.86%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MU's 112.21%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-2.06%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-227.88%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 407.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
27.19%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MU's 118.49%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
We repay more while MU is negative at -7.08%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
506.84%
Issuance growth of 506.84% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.