PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.84%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -62.60%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.76%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 6.84%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
104.87%
Well above MU's 106.92% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
7.13%
SBC growth of 7.13% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-222.02%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 163.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
150.03%
AR growth of 150.03% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-4655.62%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -335.71%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-43.20%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-243.12%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 178.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-239.71%
Negative yoy while MU is 326.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-51.00%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 21.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-36.05%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -204.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -1323.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-34.82%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -140.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-197.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -620.45%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.63%
Issuance growth of 1.63% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.