PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.97%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -52.09%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.60%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -2.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
211.24%
Well above MU's 372.41% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
2.26%
SBC growth while MU is negative at -5.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-70.14%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -224.21%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-773.73%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-7.05%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -287.88%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-26.15%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
71.54%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -92.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
170.05%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -88.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-107.79%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -32.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
24.34%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -34.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.71%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MU's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
45.70%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.79%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -90.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-173.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -590.22%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
37.58%
We slightly raise equity while MU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.