PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-202.45%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -56.40%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-1.22%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -6.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-305.88%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-2.17%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
156.04%
Well above MU's 233.90% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
186.33%
AR growth of 186.33% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
19.10%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 46.88%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-601.18%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
444.25%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MU's 2160.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
98.38%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -240.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
736.35%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 10.52%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-120.40%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -55.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-132.93%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
140.35%
Liquidation growth of 140.35% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -83.94%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-3.55%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 72.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-76.55%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.