PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
160.20%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 2.67%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
0.65%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 12.55%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
150.85%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -94.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
2.22%
SBC growth of 2.22% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-68.65%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -112.66%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-102.52%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
221.91%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -119.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
154.11%
AP growth of 154.11% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-145.60%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -42.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-112.97%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -442.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
517.80%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -27.19%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
42.03%
CapEx growth well above MU's 31.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.21%
Purchases growth of 17.21% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-34.11%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
91.41%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MU's 574.36%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-37.68%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 83.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-3.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -84.75%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
77.68%
Issuance growth of 77.68% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.