PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
102.27%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -274.03%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.03%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 1.46%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-116.41%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 1075.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.76%
SBC growth of 0.76% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
423.03%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -690.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1608.83%
AR growth of 1608.83% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-41.79%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 91.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-205.04%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
407.85%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -213.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-3664.96%
Negative yoy while MU is 165.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
104.86%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -39.90%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
2.20%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -76.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.26%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 18.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-19.17%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-287.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -87.03%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-88.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -518.66%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-190.70%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 76.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
178.34%
Issuance growth of 178.34% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.