PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.09%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -50.80%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
9.20%
D&A growth of 9.20% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
38.65%
Deferred tax of 38.65% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
13.26%
Less SBC growth vs. MU's 50.00%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-321.52%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 420.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-1188.16%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
193.84%
Inventory growth well above MU's 194.12%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-215.57%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-15.91%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 536.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
74.88%
Well above MU's 7.25%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-52.37%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 42.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
25.23%
CapEx growth well above MU's 43.76%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.67%
Purchases growth of 33.67% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
85.70%
Liquidation growth of 85.70% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-293.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -352.94%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-8.20%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 34.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-7.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 95.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-53.69%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.