PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.62%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -13.48%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.44%
D&A growth of 0.44% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-150.06%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-7.56%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -30.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
106.64%
Well above MU's 107.50% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
176.86%
AR growth of 176.86% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
26.97%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 1043.75%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
128.31%
AP growth of 128.31% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-31.20%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 3.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-758.45%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -101.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
197.99%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 19.51%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-67.37%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 29.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-115.88%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-5.65%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -935.06%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-5.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -69.94%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-20.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -1175.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
30.90%
Issuance growth of 30.90% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.